Shop’NCook Blog

The latest news on Shop’NCook, cooking and grocery shopping.
Subscribe

Archive for September, 2007

Recipe costing: waste or no waste?

September 27, 2007 By: Mathilde Category: Shop'NCook, Tips, Recipe costing No Comments →

Waste in recipe costing can be quite confusing. I will try to clarify here how and why waste should be included in recipe costing calculations and how it is taken into account in Shop’NCook Pro software.

A simple waste example

Quantities in recipes often refer to a pared product. For example, when you have a recipe requiring 1 cup of chopped onions, it refers to pared onions, different from the onions as purchased. One cup of onions weighs 160g (5.7oz), but since onions include in average 10% of refuse (stem ends, sprouts and defects), you have to purchase actually not 160g but 178g (6.4oz) of onions to make one cup of chopped onions. If you don’t include the waste in your recipe costing calculation, you will end up underestimating the cost of the recipe.

This is a straight-forward case where waste should always be included. Now, Shop’NCook Pro includes already in its database basic refuse precentage. To include the waste in the recipe costing, all you have to do is make sure that the waste correction is enabled in the cost preferences (the checkbox “Correct weight for refuse” in the Costing tab of the Preferences must be selected).

How do I know if the cost is corrected for waste?

When calculating the cost of a recipe with waste correction enabled, you have an additional column in the costing window for the corrected weight. It is a good practice to always check where waste corrections are made and if they correspond to the actual difference between the product as purchased and the product used in the recipe. If they don’t, read below!

A less simple waste example

Waste is not always straight-forward! In fact, waste can be included in some recipes and not in others. Depending on what you are making, you may purchase a product that includes the waste, or the same product without it. Let take for example walnuts. I would bet that your supermarket carries both shelled walnuts and walnuts with the shell. If you examine the walnuts item of the default database, you see that it includes 55% of refuse for the shells. It refers therefore to unshelled walnuts. When a recipe specifies walnuts, the weight is then corrected for waste and more than doubled in the recipe costing calculation.

What should you do if you purchase already shelled walnuts? You can edit the nutritional information of the walnuts item of the database, clear the refuse description and set the refuse percent to zero. Also, make sure to change the item description to “shelled walnuts”. In this way, walnuts weight will not be corrected for waste anymore in the recipe costing.

But I purchase both shelled and unshelled walnuts!

If you purchase both shelled and unshelled walnuts, depending on the recipe, you have to proceed in a different way. Obviously, since these are two different products with different prices, you need to have two entries in the database of grocery items. Since the existing walnuts item refers to the unshelled one, you have to add a “shelled walnuts” item to the database, with a refuse percent of zero. When you want to purchase the shelled walnuts for a recipe, you have to make sure that the “walnuts” ingredient of the recipe links to the “shelled walnuts” item of the database. It will be linked automatically to the correct item if you write “shelled walnuts” instead of just “walnuts” in the recipe. In this way, the correct refuse percentage is used in both cases.

What should I do if the weights in my recipes include the refuse?

Let’s take again the case of (unshelled) walnuts. Walnuts includes 55% of refuse in the database. What should you do if your recipes lists the quantity of walnuts with the shells? Since the software assumes the quantities in the recipes exclude the refuse, it will overestimate the quantity of walnuts you need and this will be reflected in the cost out and in the nutritional analysis of your recipes. You cannot simply set the refuse to zero: if you do, the nutritional data for walnuts will be about two times to high. Also, predefined measures like 1 cup of walnuts will not be correct anymore.

If you don’t want to correct as well the nutritional and weight conversion data for walnuts, you can instead create new units in the nutritional data editor for walnuts, like “cup with shell” and “oz with shell”. The weight of “cup with shell” should be 45% (i.e. 100%-55%) of the actual weight of 1 cup of walnuts with shells, i.e. corresponds to the weight of 1 cup of unshelled walnuts minus the refuse. Similarly, the weight of “oz with shell” should be 45% of 1 oz. To get the correct costing, you just have to specify the quantities using the newly defined units. The advantage of this approach is that you will be able to use both quantities with and without refuses.

Now, if you are not already too confused…

What should I do if the item is listed without waste in the database, but I purchase it with waste?

In this case, edit the refuse information of the item and set it to the waste percentage of the product you purchase. The nutritional analysis will not be affected, but the recipe cost out will be corrected for the waste.

Example: The “clams” item in the database is for clams without shells and has a refuse percentage of zero. If you purchase clams with shell, edit the item to set the refuse percent to 85%. Assuming your recipes list quantities without shell, the cost and the nutritional information will be correctly calculated. You can also add new units to the item to be able to specify quantities with shell in your recipes too, like the predefined “lb, with shell”. The weight of the units with waste should be set to the corresponding weight without waste.

In summary…

  • Waste must be included only if the quantity in the recipe does not include the waste that is a part of the product as-purchased.
  • For products that can include waste, check that the database item corresponds to the product you purchase. If it doesn’t, modify the refuse data to correspond to the product you purchase.
  • The quantities (weight or volume) in the recipes should be the quantities after the refuse has been removed. If you want to specify a quantity before removing the waste, define a new unit for the product that includes explicitly the waste. Alternatively, edit the nutritional and unit data for the product so that they correspond to the product measured before the waste is removed.

Finally, a free Nutrition Facts labeling tool!

September 25, 2007 By: Mathilde Category: Nutrition facts panel, Nutrition 4 Comments →

Example of nutritional facts label generated by the free tool A few people have asked me for a software to print Food Nutrition Facts Labels to use in conjunction with Shop’NCook nutritional analysis. I made some research, but couldn’t find a free nutrition facts labeling tool on the internet. As far as I can tell, there isn’t any nutrition facts labeling software at all on the Mac OS X platform and the couple of programs I tried on Windows produced good-looking labels, but they did not follow the complex FDA rules.

To fill this gap, I have written a free tool to make nutrition facts labels. It is easy to use and online, so you don’t need to download anything. Click the button below to get started or continue to read if you want more information.

What does it do?

You input the nutritional values for the different nutrients on the form and it will format them according to the FDA code, section 101.9, that implements the provisions of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) of 1990.

Update 6 Jan 2008: it implements now also the amendment of July 11, 2003 about trans fat, effective January 1st 2006.

What is the serving size?

FDA rules has strict instructions on selecting the size of a serving. If you are not sure what is the serving size of your product, check the regulations.

What nutrients must be input in the form?

You must input the following compulsory nutrient values:

  • total calories
  • calories from fat
  • total fat
  • saturated fat
  • trans fat
  • cholesterol
  • sodium
  • total carbohydrate
  • dietary fiber
  • sugars
  • protein
  • vitamin A
  • vitamin C
  • calcium
  • iron

Additionally, some voluntary nutrients can be added. The only voluntary nutrient supported at the time being by the form is sugar alcohol. If you need other voluntary components, let me know and I will add them as time allows.

What are the voluntary components of the nutrition facts panel?

The voluntary components are:

  • calories from saturated fat
  • polyunsaturated fat
  • monounsaturated fat
  • potassium
  • soluble fiber
  • insoluble fiber
  • sugar alcohol (for example, the sugar substitutes xylitol, mannitol and sorbitol)
  • other carbohydrate (the difference between total carbohydrate and the sum of dietary fiber, sugars, and sugar alcohol if declared)
  • percent of vitamin A present as beta-carotene
  • Vitamin D
  • Vitamin E
  • Vitamin K
  • Thiamin
  • Riboflavin
  • Niacin
  • Vitamin B6
  • Folate
  • Vitamin B12
  • Biotin
  • Pantothenic acid
  • Phosphorus
  • Iodine
  • Magnesium
  • Zinc
  • Selenium
  • Copper
  • Manganese
  • Chromium
  • Molybdenum
  • Chloride

Can the online nutrition facts tool be used for every kind of food?

No, it cannot be used in any of the following three cases:

  1. If the food is not targeting the general population, but less than 4-year-old children, infants, pregnant or lactating women.
  2. For meat and poultry products as they are regulated by USDA and are not covered by NLEA.
  3. If the panel must include some of voluntary components not supported by the script. A voluntary component must be included if you make a claim on your label about it or if the food is enriched by it.

Can I use the nutrition facts tool in Canada (UK, Australia, etc.)?

No, this tool is based only on US nutrition facts panel rules. If there are enough interest, I may add other countries at a later time.

Do you guarantee the nutrition facts tool follows FDA rules?

No. I have done my best to follow the FDA formatting rules to the word, but it is a free tool and I don’t guarantee I didn’t make mistakes. I guarantee however to fix promptly any mistake pointed out to me.

How do I get the nutrient values?

The USDA has a database of nutrient values for a large number of food. You can also use a cooking software like Shop’NCook to compute the nutritional analysis from a recipe.

Can I use the nutrition facts labeling tool directly from Shop’NCook software?

Not yet. If there is enough interest, I will add a function to populate up the form directly from Shop’NCook. If you would like such a function, leave a comment or send me a message.

Anyway, do I need a nutrition facts panel on my products?

If you have a small business and don’t make any health claim on your label, you probably don’t need a nutrition facts panel, but you may have to notify the FDA to be able to claim an exemption. When exempt products carry nutritional information, they must however follow the regulation. For a lot of useful information on this and on the type of claims allowed on a food product label, go here.

Get started now with the free nutrition facts label tool!

Two new free cookbooks

September 23, 2007 By: Mathilde Category: Cooking, Recipes, Cookbooks No Comments →

The following two cookbooks are available for download:

  • Collected Through the Years, a collection of 176 recipes by Kathy L. Pugh
  • Crock pot recipes, a collection of 160 recipes

Go now to the cookbook download page

A new Shop’NCook blog

September 23, 2007 By: Mathilde Category: General 1 Comment →

I am the author of Shop’NCook and am starting this blog to list the latest news about Shop’NCook and share some thoughts about organizing cooking and grocery shopping. To keep up-to-date with Shop’NCook, subscribe to the blog’s RSS feed (that’s the little icon on the right of the address bar) or follow ShopNCook on Twitter.

To learn more about me, visit my About page.

If you have suggestions to help make Shop’NCook still better, write me here.